Legal Opinion

Petition of Building D, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1993No. C8-93-5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Building N, Inc. appeals from a judgment entered by the district court determining that under the doctrine of practical location of boundaries by acquiescence respondent Arrowhead Electric, Inc. was the owner of the southerly one-half of vacated Buchanan Street.

FACTS

Appellant is the owner of Lot 2, Lake Avenue, Cowell’s Addition to Duluth, and Lot 1, Minnesota Avenue, Cowell’s Addition. The lots are adjoining, with Lot 2 lying to the east of Lot 1. Lot 1 was registered in 1910 and Lot 2 was registered in 1923. Buchanan Street runs along the southern boundaries of Lots…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Engquist v. WirtjesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Moore v. HenricksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Matter of ZahradkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denman v. GansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Petition of McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Ugorets v. City of ShorewoodDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API