Petition of McGinnis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Richard Williams, Jr. challenges summary judgment that his claim for adverse possession is invalid against Torrens property. Williams argues that as the owner of an adjacent abstract parcel, he had no notice that the subject property was in Torrens because it was originally registered without delineation of boundaries. We affirm summary judgment because no boundary dispute existed prior to registration and there is no ambiguity in the property description.
FACTS
This real property dispute arose between owners of two adjacent parcels, one which is Torrens…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Gifford v. VoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Moore v. HenricksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Denman v. GansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Petition of GeisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Petition of GeisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998