Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Solomon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 6 Div. 61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The appellant, James Coleman, borrowed $400 from Madeline Solomon through her husband and agent, David R. Solomon, executing his note for $457 payable in six months, with interest. It being claimed that the $57 covered commissions, cost, etc. The appellant was the owner of eight promissory notes for $500 each, executed by' one J. R. Smith, and which were secured by a mortgage on real estate purchased from said Coleman by said Smith, the consideration for the purchase being approximately $9,000. The note given hypothecated said eight notes aggregating $4,000 as collateral security for said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hicks v. DowdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Barnett v. DowdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Persons v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Castner v. DarbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. DeMoville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Wood River Development, Inc. v. ArmbresterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Mercury Realty Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API