Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Dowdy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1922No. 8 Div. 366PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The original bill was filed March 3, 1917, and the case was considered in Hicks v. Dowdy, 202 Ala. 535, 81 South. 37. As amended, the bill was sought to be made to conform to the pronouncements of the former decision, and was by the pledgor to disaffirm and redeem from the sale of collateral, to require the pledgee, purchasing at his own sale without authority, to account for the income, profits, and benefits derived from the pledged property while in possession of the pledgee as the alleged purchaser at foreclosure sale. The amendments bear date, respectively, of April 25, 1919, and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Mewburn's Heirs v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Gilmer v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. First Nat. Bank v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ruffin v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Mobile Towing & Wrecking Co. v. HartwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. McGowin v. McGowinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Wood, Wire & Metal Lathers International, Local No. 216 v. Brown & Root, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API