Legal Opinion

Castner v. Darby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ingham; Person, J. Assumpsit by Edward P. Castner against Lewis Gr. Darby to recover the value of chattels converted. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore' J.

Prior to September 26, 1894, defendant kept a hotel known as the “Tivola House,” now known *242as the “ Butler House,” in the city of Lansing. He leased the hotel, but owned all the kitchen, dining-room, office, sleeping-room, and other furniture and fixtures in the hotel. In September he made ah exchange of his furniture and fixtures with plaintiff for other property. The hotel furniture and fixtures were valued in the exchange at $1,200. To secure the payment of $239.46 of the pur- ^ chase price, the plaintiff gave defendant a chattel mortgage upon all the hotel fixtures and furniture…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Newman v. OlneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Grinnell v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. Security Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Coleman v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. First State Bank of Ardmore v. DoughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Johnson v. People's State BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API