Legal Opinion
Cassem v. Crenlo, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 17, 1991No. CX-90-2520, C7-90-2541PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case involves a number of issues including “service” of an MMI report, what is a “subd. 3e” suitable job, the role played by monitoring period compensation, the assessment of penalties, and credit for mistaken payments.
In March 1984, while working for employer Crenlo, Inc., employee Mark Cassem sustained a Gillette-type back injury resulting in surgery and a 9-percent permanent partial disability. Cassem returned to work at Crenlo until January 1986, when he had a second back surgery resulting in an additional 6-percent permanent partial disability. 1
After his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Gasper v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Patton v. Thompson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Christianson v. Axel H. Ohman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sabby v. Copasan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boryca v. Marvin Lumber & CedarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Jerde v. Adolfson and PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Monson v. White Bear MitsubishiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Bruns v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Maktari v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.