Legal Opinion

Maktari v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1992No. CX-91-1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

We review on certiorari a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing an award of temporary total benefits under Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 3j. 1 We reverse and remand for further proceedings in conformance with this opinion.

In 1978 Nagib Maktari started working at the Ford Motor Company plant in Dear-born, Michigan. Following a layoff, the employee transferred to the Ford plant in St. Paul, Minnesota under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between Ford and the United Auto Workers. The same agreement authorized a return to Michigan as soon as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Cassem v. Crenlo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Ransom v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boryca v. Marvin Lumber & CedarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Minter v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API