Legal Opinion

State Budget Commission v. Lebus

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1932PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson.—

Affirming.

When the General Assembly convened on the first Tuesday in January, 1932, there were in existence auditor’s warrants, indorsed by the state treasurer as interest bearing, aggregating more than $13,000,000. By •Senate Bill No. 454, adopted by the G-eneral Assembly at its 1932 session, and approved by the Governor, these warrants were recognized as debts of the commonwealth, and their payment was provided for by the issuance and sale of bonds by the State Budget Commission, to the amount of $14,000,000.

A suit was filed in the Franklin circuit…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fletcher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Shaw v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Davis v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API