Legal Opinion

Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Gomez

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 12, 2001No. 06-00-00017-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Justice.

Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. appeals from a judgment awarding Raymond Gomez, et al., damages for personal injuries resulting from Gomez’s use of a silica-based abrasive product (hereafter “silica flint” or “silica sand”) supplied by Humble Sand. The jury found that the silica flint supplied by Humble Sand to Spincote, Gomez’s employer, did not adequately warn users about the danger of the product. Humble Sand appeals to this Court, claiming that it had no duty to warn Gomez of the dangers of the silica flint because it only sold its product to sophisticated users. In the…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Walker v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. James v. KloosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Buls v. Fuselier, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Hanus v. Texas Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API