Dale K. Barker Co., PC v. Bushnell
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
1 1 Third-party defendant Dale K. Barker appeals the district court's denial of his request for attorney fees and costs. We affirm. The underlying basis for the third-party complaint was an alter ego theory grounded in corporate law, not a contract containing an attorney fee provision. Accordingly, the reciprocal attorney fees statute is inapplicable.
BACKGROUND
12 Third-party plaintiff John K. Bushnell asserted claims against Barker for breach of contract and negligence based on the theory that Barker was the alter ego of Dale K. Barker Co., PC (Barker Company). The district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Prows v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bushnell v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Dale K. Barker Co., Pc v. John K. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Dale K. Barker Co. v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014