Legal Opinion

Dale K. Barker Co., PC v. Bushnell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 24, 2009No. 20081035-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

1 1 Third-party defendant Dale K. Barker appeals the district court's denial of his request for attorney fees and costs. We affirm. The underlying basis for the third-party complaint was an alter ego theory grounded in corporate law, not a contract containing an attorney fee provision. Accordingly, the reciprocal attorney fees statute is inapplicable.

BACKGROUND

12 Third-party plaintiff John K. Bushnell asserted claims against Barker for breach of contract and negligence based on the theory that Barker was the alter ego of Dale K. Barker Co., PC (Barker Company). The district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prows v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dale K. Barker Co., Pc v. John K. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. Dale K. Barker Co. v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API