Legal Opinion

Prows v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1991No. 890161PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Richard S. Prows, Robert W. Wood, and Foothill Federated Corporation (collectively “Foothill Federated” or “plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their amended complaint as to defendants Utah Department of Financial Institutions (“DFI”) and the State of Utah (collectively “the State”). 1 The amended complaint sought recovery from the State for losses plaintiffs suffered when Foothill Federated Corporation was unable to continue operating as a financial institution. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the amended complaint.

In its present form, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Franco v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonoughUtah Supreme Court · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API