Bushnell v. Barker
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice LEE,
opinion of the Court:
T1 This is a contract dispute between an accounting firm and its client that has ebbed on appeal into a contest over attorney fees and costs. The district court denied Dale Barker's request for attorney fees under the reciprocal attorney fees statute, Utah Code section 78B-5-826. The court of appeals affirmed. It also affirmed denial of Barker's request for costs. We affirm the court of appeals' decision as to attorney fees under our analysis in Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc., 2012 UT 19, -- P.3d -, 2012 WL 10086583, a parallel case also decided today.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- VFP VC v. Dakota Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Sean Wood, L.L.C. v. Hegarty Group, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Shaoxing County Huayue Import & Export v. BhaumikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Dale K. Barker Co., PC v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones & Trevor Marketing, Inc. v. LowryUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Brodkin v. Tuhaye Golf, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Dale K. Barker Co. v. BushnellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Celtig v. PateyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Commercial Club Building v. Global RescueCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.