Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Friedman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2000No. 33956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a district court order denying admission of a will to probate on the basis that the will was not attested by at least two competent witnesses as required by NRS 133.040. The issue in this appeal is whether the signature of a notary public may constitute the signature of an attesting witness to a will. We conclude that the signature of the notary in this case may constitute the signature of a witness under NRS 133.040, if the notary signed the self-proving affidavit in the presence of the testator. We therefore reverse the order of the district court. Because it…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Madera v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. County of Clark v. DoumaniNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Estate of AlfaroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Matter of Estate of MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GerhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Estate of Maxey v. DardenNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bussberg v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Flynn v. GatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API