Legal Opinion

Estate of Maxey v. Darden

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2008No. 47737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we consider, for the first time, multiple sections of Nevada’s Uniform Act on Rights of the Terminally 111 (the Act), codified in NRS 449.535 through 449.690. The Act authorizes the use of three procedures by which terminally ill patients or their families can legally implement their wishes with regard to withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. First, an individual may execute a declaration directing an attending physician to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment under certain circumstances. Second, an individual may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Edgington v. EdgingtonNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Richardson Construction, Inc. v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sustainable Growth Initiative Committee v. Jumpers, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re the Estate of FriedmanNevada Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cook v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API