Legal Opinion

Mundil v. Hutson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1928No. Nos. 3254, 3263PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Two appeals, Nos. 3254 and 3263, have been argued and submitted together, and, as they are closely related, will be disposed of in one opinion. In both Mundil was plaintiff below and is here appellant, and Hutson was defendant, and is here appellee. They will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant respectively.

Plaintiff’s cause of action was an indebtedness of some $1,800. He filed an affidavit in attachment, alleging, in addition to the indebtedness:

“That he has good reason to believe, and does believe, that the defendant is about to fraudulently convey,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stockard v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Pace v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Challenge Co. v. SartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Folsom v. TeichnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Saint Louis Clay Products Co. v. ChristopherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Laughlin v. LumbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Andrew Brown Company v. Painters Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API