Folsom v. Teichner

•ChrIstiancy, Cu. J.

The only question in this case arises upon the affidavit annexed to a writ of attachment issued from the circuit •court for tlie coxmty of Wayne.

The affidavit, after stating the indebtedness in due form, states that the plaintiff has good reason to believe, that the defendant has absconded from the state, to the injury of his creditors. This was in compliance with section 2 of chapter 114 of the Revised Statutes of 1846, (Comp. L. 1871, ;§ 6398), sub-division “first,” and was sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to the writ in the first instance, and to warrant the seizure…