Legal Opinion

Pace v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1882No. Case No. 1315PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. Green J. Clark. .The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Bonner, Associate Justice.

On December 14, 1881, Schneider & Davis instituted, suit in the district court of Hunt county against J. M. Smith, and at the same time sued out a writ of attachment. This was executed by levying upon certain personal property belonging to Smith, which, being perishable, was, by order of the court, sold by the sheriff of Hunt county. The net proceeds of this sale, $413.94, was, as required by statute, deposited with A. Gr. Pace as the clerk of said court.

Subsequently, in February, 1882, on motion of defendant Smith, the attachment was quashed, and the money ordered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marsteller v. FawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1803
  2. Brooks v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  3. Dunlop v. . Patterson Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Edwards v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Taylor v. GilleanTexas Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Pecan Valley Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  2. Curtis v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Challenge Co. v. SartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Hardy v. Construction Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Houston Drywall, Inc. v. Construction Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API