Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Fuller

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1956No. 8409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTHEN, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s motion for nonsuit against respondent; and from a judgment entered in favor of respondent and against appellant.

Appellant Harold Fuller entered into a •contract with third-party defendant, Don C. Christensen, a general contractor, for the remodeling of Fuller’s home for the agreed price of $5,770. Appellant did not require Christensen to furnish bond pursuant to the provisions of Sections 14-2-1 and 14-2-2, Utah Code Annotated, which provide:

“14-2-1. The owner of any interest in land entering into a contract, involving $500 or more,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dow v. United States Ex Rel. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Matchett v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Liberty Coal & Lumber Co. v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State for Use of Smith v. Tyonek Timber, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Green v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API