Legal Opinion

State for Use of Smith v. Tyonek Timber, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1984No. 7170, 7256PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This appeal involves contract and negligence claims by appellant Fred L. Smith (Smith), a concrete subcontractor, against appellees Tyonek Timber, Inc. (Tyonek), the manufacturer and supplier of concrete, H & S Construction, Inc. (H & S), the general contractor, and its surety, Maryland Casualty Co. (Maryland) for the replacement costs of a defective concrete floor slab.

The primary issues presented on this appeal are whether the trial court erred (1) in granting a directed verdict in favor of Tyo-nek precluding recovery for economic loss based on a negligence cause of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Forest v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jones v. ShortAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API