Legal Opinion

State v. Jaramillo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2004No. 23191PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, J.

{1} Rule 5-604 NMRA 2003, the six-month rule for criminal cases, “is a bright-line rule, designed to assure prompt disposition of criminal eases.” State v. Cardenas, 2003-NMCA-051, ¶ 12,133 N.M. 516, 64 P.3d 543 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). At the same time, however, our Supreme Court has cautioned that the rule is to be read with common sense and not to effectuate technical dismissals. State v. Mendoza, 108 N.M. 446, 449, 774 P.2d 440, 443 (1989); State v. Flores, 99 N.M. 44, 46, 653 P.2d 875, 877 (1982). Like so many of the six-month rule cases, this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. CardenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. LittlefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API