Legal Opinion
State v. Eskridge
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1997No. 17090PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
1. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and his motion to dismiss for violation of his sixth amendment constitutional speedy trial rights and the six-month rule, Rule 5-604(B), NMRA1997. We affirm.
I.SIX-MONTH RULE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL
2. Initially, we note that in this ease the trial court failed to analyze for a violation of the six-month rule independent of its speedy trial constitutional analysis. A six-month rule issue is analytically separate from a constitutional speedy trial issue and the inquiry…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MaddoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. IngramNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.