Legal Opinion

State v. Littlefield

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2008No. 27,504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} Defendant, who was incarcerated pending trial, was granted a furlough to seek medical treatment. He absconded, a warrant was issued for his arrest, the trial date was vacated, and he was arrested on the warrant four days prior to the vacated trial setting and forty days prior to the expiration of an extension of the six-month rule that had been granted by the Supreme Court. After the extension expired, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which the district court denied. Defendant reserved this issue pursuant to a conditional plea. We affirm the district court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. DonahooNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. LucasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Ramos-ArenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. LittlefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. ManzanaresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API