Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2009No. 28,665PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBLES, Judge.

{1} The State appeals a district court order dismissing four felony charges against Elíseo Santos Martinez (Defendant), pursuant to Rule 5-604 NMRA (six-month rule). On appeal, the State argues that (1) Rule 5-604(B)(5) does not require a bench warrant to be issued for a new six-month period to begin, but instead “merely requires that the defendant fail to appear” to a court setting; (2) the district court erred in determining that if a bench warrant is quashed before a defendant is arrested or surrenders, there can be no triggering event for a new six-month period under…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. NabhanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API