Legal Opinion
Bacon v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1924No. 24,073PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant is a corporation maintaining a live stock yard at which it maintains facilities for loading, unloading, caring for, buying, selling and dealing in live stock of all kinds. The complaint alleges that since the first day of August, 1918, the plaintiff has continually been employed in and about the yards of defendant and in and about buying, selling and dealing in live stock therein and that during said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Faunce v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Victor Talking Machine Co. v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Canellos v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Mealey v. Bemidji Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Shirley C. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.