Legal Opinion
Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 1925No. 24,870PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 205 N.W. 630, 206 N.W. 396. In June, 1923, James E. Gibbons and Jessie C. Carnes, doing business under the name of Gibbons Carnes, were buying and selling live stock on a commission basis at defendant's stockyards. Jessie C. Carnes is plaintiff's wife. Plaintiff alleges that he was employed by Gibbons Carnes as a salesman, while defendant aleges that plaintiff was really a member of the firm and in the active management of the business.
Gibbons and his partner were members of the South St. Paul Live Stock Exchange until June 6, when they were suspended from membership for 30 days…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Brown v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.