Legal Opinion

Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Estate of Bell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 18, 1995No. 940151-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the estate of Justin Bell. Specifically, the court held that, at the time of his death, Bell was covered by a valid automobile insurance policy issued by Phoenix. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are not in dispute. On July 10, 1991, Justin Bell applied for an automobile insurance policy with Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company through Lyons & Associates, an independent insurance agency. The policy, covering his 1980 Saab, included liability and personal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Russell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Armotek Industries, Inc., Appellant/cross in 90-5969 v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, Appellee/cross in 90-6001Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Copper State Leasing Co. v. Blacker Appliance & Furniture Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Nielsen v. O'REILLYUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Christensen v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asael Farr & Sons Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  2. Behar v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2008
  3. In Re Waste Systems International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
  4. Burlington Ins. Co. v. Utah Navajo FairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API