Behar v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs Ron and Danielle Behar and their business entity, through their bankruptcy trustee, assert breach of contract and bad faith claims against their purported commercial liability insurer. 1 Both sides have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set out below, the Court holds that summary judgment is appropriate because no dispute of material fact exists as to whether Plaintiffs were insured for purposes of the liability claim at issue.
Standard
Summary judgment is proper only if the moving party shows…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK), PLC v. Sea Cat I, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Marcus v. Nathan Segal and Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Cushing Hospitality LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021