Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Swenson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1994No. 930048PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

DURHAM, Justice:

This case is before the court on a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs Jeff Christensen and Kyle James Fausett claim that the court of appeals erred when it concluded that defendant Burns International Security Services (“Burns”) was not hable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the actions of its employee, Gloria Swenson. The court of appeals determined that Swenson was acting outside the scope of her employment at the time of her automobile accident with Christensen and Fausett and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Carter v. BesseyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Christensen v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. White v. DeseelhorstUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wardley Better Homes and Gardens v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. 4447 Associates v. First Security FinancialCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Bowler v. Deseret Village Ass'n, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API