Legal Opinion

Albert v. Orwige

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 16, 1987PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMLIN, Presiding Judge, Western Section.

Defendants, Frank M. Orwige and wife (hereafter “defendants”), appeal from an order of the Greene County Chancery Court enjoining them from maintaining a “mobile home” on their property in violation of a restrictive covenant applicable to the subdivision in which their property was located and at the same time ordering the structure to be removed. The determinative issue in this case is whether the chancellor was in error in finding that the defendants’ structure was a “mobile home” as defined in T.C.A. § 55-1-105. We hold that he was not and affirm.

By…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Jones v. BeiberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Town of Manchester v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. In Re WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hicks v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Williams v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Beacon Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. Palmer Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. White v. McGowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Fox Farm Estates Landowners Ass'n v. KreischMontana Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API