Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 24, 1998No. 03A01-9701-CH-00019PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

The plaintiff, David Hicks (“Hicks”), 1 sued Gene E. Cox (“Cox”) and Connie Whittaker (“Whittaker”) 2 , each of whom owns an interest in property immediately adjacent to Hicks’ subdivision lot, seeking to enforce deed restrictions that prohibit, among other things, the placing of “trailers” on the defendants’ property. The trial court held that, even assuming the restrictions pertaining to the defendants’ property were broad enough to cover Whittaker’s single-wide mobile home, the “enforcement of such restriction has been waived or [Hicks] should be es-topped to enforce…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rainey v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Turnley v. GarfinkelTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Scandlyn v. McDill Columbus Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Shea v. SargentTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Nashville Ford Tractor, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. Parks Properties v. Maury CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Williams v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API