Hicks v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUSANO, Judge.
The plaintiff, David Hicks (“Hicks”), 1 sued Gene E. Cox (“Cox”) and Connie Whittaker (“Whittaker”) 2 , each of whom owns an interest in property immediately adjacent to Hicks’ subdivision lot, seeking to enforce deed restrictions that prohibit, among other things, the placing of “trailers” on the defendants’ property. The trial court held that, even assuming the restrictions pertaining to the defendants’ property were broad enough to cover Whittaker’s single-wide mobile home, the “enforcement of such restriction has been waived or [Hicks] should be es-topped to enforce…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Rainey v. StansellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Turnley v. GarfinkelTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Scandlyn v. McDill Columbus Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Shea v. SargentTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Nashville Ford Tractor, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Parks Properties v. Maury CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Williams v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.