Essman v. Hood
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
The complainant’s bill for an injunction against forty-one sheriffs and chiefs of police, as state officials of various counties and cities, including Dallas, Fort Worth, Ama*882rillo, Wichita Falls, Corsicana, Greenville, Meltinney, Sherman, Cleburne, Eastland, Vernon, Waxahachie, and others, recites:
That he resides in Missouri and is engaged in the business of owning and operating and leasing “an automatic confection and vending machine,” which machine, upon the deposit of a five-eent coin, automatically produces for the depositor a uniform package of mints. That the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ashcraft v. HealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pullen v. PattonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1937
- Durant v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1931
- Bradford v. HurtDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1936
- Pughe v. PattonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1937
- Callison v. WelchDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.