Legal Opinion

Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1948No. Civ. 16288PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following plaintiffs’ failure to amend after a demurrer to their second amended complaint had been sustained.

Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in sustaining the demurrers to the original complaint, to the amended complaint and to the second amended complaint. Insofar as the demurrers to the first two of these pleadings are concerned, plaintiffs by amending them after the demurrers had been sustained waived error, if any, in the rulings of the court. (Alhambra Transfer & Storage Co. v. Muse, 41 Cal.App.2d 92, 93 [106 P.2d 63] ; Carter v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API