Bevy's Dry Cleaners & Shirt Laundry, Inc. v. Streble
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchneideb, J.
The present strife between the several parties to this appeal began with the words and conduct adopted by their respective precursors in interest. Bevy’s antecedent owners and corporate officers negotiated and executed its lease and launched its business. Speedi bears the burden and enjoys the benefits of the acts of its assignor. Therefore, solutions to the questions involved depend upon the rights and duties created by the respective leases and are unaffected by the subsequent conduct of the present parties in interest, despite the fact that Bevy’s lease was of record by memorandum when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Posner v. Air Brakes Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Otting v. GradskyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Hayslett v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ewing v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Gillen-Crow Pharmacies, Inc. v. MandzakOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. Marc's Variety Store, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.