Legal Opinion

Collingsworth v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1955No. A-5268PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The respondent instituted this suit to recover the sum of $22,307.94, and to foreclose a vendor’s lien. The sum sued for included principal, interest and attorney’s fees claimed to be due and owing on the vendor’s lien notes numbered three and four of a series of five notes which had been executed on January 1, 1949 by M. H. Coleman in favor of Thomas S. Wallace as a part of the purchase price for certain lots of parcels of land situated in Cameron County, Texas. The notes involved were due and payable at Harlingen, Texas, on September 1, 1951 and September 1, 1952, respectively, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  3. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ingham v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Laning v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Findlay v. CaveTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tuthill v. Southwestern Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Glen Alden Corp. v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API