Legal Opinion

Borman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the dismissal of Michael P. *781Borman’s (Claimant) claim petition by the referee. We reverse.

Claimant suffered a stroke on August 24, 1987, while working in the course of his employment as an electrician for Bechtel Construction, Inc. (Employer). Claimant subsequently filed a claim petition for worker’s compensation benefits on November 22, 1988, alleging that his working conditions which included the physical stress of his job were the cause of his stroke. The petition was assigned to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Thomas V. Ferrick, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Shadyside Hospital/Heritage v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Pennsylvania Power & Light v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API