Legal Opinion
Shadyside Hospital/Heritage v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, President Judge.
The Shadyside Hospital/Heritage (the hospital) appeals from the decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed the decision of a referee to grant the reinstatement petition of the claimant, Kathleen Berry. The hospital contends that the 1993 amendments to § 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 834, retroactively require the referee to produce a reasoned decision. In addition, Berry appeals the decision of the board reversing the referee’s award of chiropractic bills. We affirm in part…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- McAfee v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- County of Delaware v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Can, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Raymond v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Borman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994