Legal Opinion

Perial Amusement Corp. v. Morse

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1973No. 890, Docket 73-1485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

In an age that has witnessed unprecedented liberality in matters sexual, we are asked on this appeal to determine whether, in proceedings for enforcement of laws against obscenity through seizure of allegedly obscene material, First Amendment rights have been violated. At issue is the appropriateness and constitutionality of proceedings instituted by the government pursuant to Rule 41, F.R.Cr.P., whereby it applied to a federal magistrate for a search and seizure *517warrant and simultaneously moved by order to show cause and subpoena duces tecum for an adversary hearing…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sherpix, Inc., United States of America v. Louis K. SherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. John Andrew JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Perial Amusement Corp. v. MorseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API