United States v. John Andrew Jacobs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, * District Judge.
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
This is another permutation in the complicated maze created by the Supreme Court’s reformulation of the boundary line between protected speech and unprotected obscenity in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).
Appellant John Andrew Jacobs was indicted, tried, and convicted for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462 (knowingly receiving an obscene film transported in interstate commerce) after June 23, 1973, the date on which the Supreme Coui’t rendered the decision…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Terry Burton KimbroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Frank Robert Gilman, Jr., and Richard Joseph MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.