Legal Opinion

Yarnell v. Gregory

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 18, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this ease the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be affirmed, AArhile Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Browne and Mr. Justice West are of the opinion that said decree should be reversed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Griffith v. AlcockeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Pensacola Electric Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Quigg v. RadelSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Amos v. HamweySupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broaddus v. TheurerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Cravatt v. PiersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Butler v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Johns and Ellzey v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API