Legal Opinion

Cravatt v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 20, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Pensacola Electric Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Quigg v. RadelSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Amos v. HamweySupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Yarnell v. GregorySupreme Court of Florida · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional ChurchSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API