Legal Opinion

Broaddus v. Theurer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 17, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Griffith v. AlcockeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Pensacola Electric Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Quigg v. RadelSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Amos v. HamweySupreme Court of Florida · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Food Fair Stores, North Dade, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Butler v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional ChurchSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API