Wake Development Co. v. O'Leary
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $3,000 alleged to have been paid to defendant under compulsion. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The plaintiff corporation was the owner of a certain tract of land and had negotiated an advantageous sale of a portion of the tract. While the purchase money was in escrow defendant levied execution upon the entire tract based upon a judgment against one J. M. Danziger. The purchaser threatened to cancel the contract unless the property was released from the levy. Plaintiff immediately brought a suit against defendant and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Vesper v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Burke v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McTigue v. Arctic Ice Cream Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- McNichols v. Nelson Valley Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. OstlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Fio Rito v. Fio RitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.