Legal Opinion

Wake Development Co. v. O'Leary

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1931No. Docket No. 8005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $3,000 alleged to have been paid to defendant under compulsion. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The plaintiff corporation was the owner of a certain tract of land and had negotiated an advantageous sale of a portion of the tract. While the purchase money was in escrow defendant levied execution upon the entire tract based upon a judgment against one J. M. Danziger. The purchaser threatened to cancel the contract unless the property was released from the levy. Plaintiff immediately brought a suit against defendant and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Vesper v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Burke v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. McTigue v. Arctic Ice Cream Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. McNichols v. Nelson Valley Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. OstlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Fio Rito v. Fio RitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API