Legal Opinion

General Tire, Inc. v. Mehlfeldt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1997No. 17793PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Defendant Horst Mehlfeldt has appealed from the trial court’s reformation of a separation agreement defendant entered into with plaintiff General Tire, Inc. The trial court concluded that the parties were mutually mistaken about the amount of compensation defendant was to receive. Defendant has argued that the trial court (1) incorrectly received into evidence memoranda of two proposals the parties discussed prior to executing the separation agreement because their admission was barred by the parol evidence rule, and (2) incorrectly reformed the final separation agreement on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ed Schory & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Frate v. RimenikOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Bellish v. C. I. T. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Justarr Corp. v. Buckeye Union InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Phoenix Concrete, Inc. v. Reserve-Creekway, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Butler County Board of Commissioners v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. 425 Beecher, L.L.C. v. Unizan Bank, National Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Marshall v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. ArcelorMittal Cleveland, Inc. v. JEWELL COKE COMPANY, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Galehouse Construction Company v. WinklerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API