ArcelorMittal Cleveland, Inc. v. JEWELL COKE COMPANY, LP
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. No. 11]
JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.
In this contract dispute, the Defendant Jewell Coke Company, L.P. (“Jewell”) moves the Court to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [Doc. 11-1.] The Plaintiffs, ArcelorMittal Cleveland Inc. and ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor LLC (collectively “ArcelorMittal”) oppose the motion. [Doc. 23.] Jewell has replied. [Doc. 30.]
For the following reasons, this Court DENIES the Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. Background
The Plaintiffs bring this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Reilley v. RichardsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Golf Vill. N. LLC v. City of PowellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
- Jewell Coke Co., Lp v. Arcelormittal USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- 4656 Company, LLC v. O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Acquisition & Research LLC v. FilionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.