Legal Opinion

State v. Lucas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1956No. 505PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Defendant, appellant, files in this Court “motion and brief” in which he moves the Court to arrest judgment in this cause for that the bill of indictment is fatally defective, and the argument submitted is in support of the motion. Thus the question: Is the bill of indictment fatally defective? Yes, it is!

In this connection subornation of perjury, the crime of which defendant stands convicted, consists in procuring another to commit the crime of perjury. G.S. 14-210. S. v. Chambers, 180 N.C. 705, 104 S.E. 670; S. v. Cannon, 227 N.C. 336, 42 S.E. 2d 343; Bell v. State, 5 Ga. App. 701, 63 S.E.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. . PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API