Legal Opinion

Pizer v. Hunt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

From the report of the auditoi1, and evidence introduced at the jury waived hearing, it appears that on May 12, 1919, one Philip E. Gash opened a margin account with the defendants under the name of “P. E. Gash” and signed a customer’s registration card. This card set .out certain stipulations and conditions which should govern the transactions between them, and contained a paragraph reading: “(2) In the making of loans or the delivery of securities either for my account or for the account of your other customers in the usual and regular course of your business, I hereby authorize you to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whipple v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Wood v. Boylston National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Beers v. McGinnisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Clark v. Northampton National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Stevens's Administrator v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Clamp-All Corp. v. ForestaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. LazereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. New England Foundation Co. v. Elliott & Watrous, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API