Legal Opinion

Beers v. McGinnis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 14, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

This is an action of tort, in which the plaintiff alleges in her amended declaration that the defendant forcibly entered her close, being land with buildings thereon situated in -Newton, and encumbered the same with tools and implements, trod down the grass, entered one of the buildings and threw down and injured its door, and did other wrongs to the close and buildings. The case was tried before the Chief Justice of the Superior Court without a jury. The defendant contended in justification of his acts that he entered the plaintiff’s premises only to finish the work of building a barn for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denham v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Campbell & Zell Co. v. Barr Pumping Engine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Cronan v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Lawrence v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Lemay v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Katsonas v. W. M. Sutherland Building & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API