Legal Opinion
Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 29, 1927PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is a bill in equity to restrain the defendant from maintaining electric wires and a pole upon or near certain premises in such manner as will interfere with the plaintiff’s use of said premises, and for other relief. The case was referred to a master. All the evidence is not reported.
The plaintiff, a New York corporation, was engaged in the “Show business” so called and maintained in various amusement parks • exhibitions of wax figures, generally under the name of the Eden Muse. The defendant, a Massachusetts corporation, maintained an amusement park in Agawam, in this Commonwealth,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Lowrie v. CastleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Durfee v. Durfee & Canning, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Sullivan v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Weiss v. Revenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- O'Brien v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.