Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. Lazere
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
In November 1968, defendant, Arthur B. Lazere, established a cash account for the purchase and sale of stock with plaintiff, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes, a stockbrokerage house. Laurence Orrick, a stockbroker-employee, was plaintiff’s agent for defendant’s account. Business was transacted at plaintiff’s Minneapolis office, but the stock which defendant purchased was kept by plaintiff with defendant’s permission at its home office in New York. As a cash customer, rather than a margin customer, defendant was obligated to promptly pay plaintiff in full for all stock…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Mayer v. . MonzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hildegarde, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re W.R. Grace & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Vanderbeek v. Vernon Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.