Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-1631PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The determination of disputed facts is a matter within the final jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission. State, ex rel. Hudson, v. Indus. Comm. (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 169, 170. Consequently, the well-settled standard of review is that the commission’s findings will be fully upheld where its determination is supported by some relevant evidence. State, ex rel. Kokocinski, v. Indus. Comm. (1984), 11 Ohio St. 3d 186, 188.

The commission outlined, in its findings of fact, the evidence which it relied upon to reach its conclusions as required by State, ex rel. Mitchell, v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Kokocinski v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Frigidaire Division v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State, ex rel. Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emp./AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API